WHY DID OCFA LET THE FIRE BURN?

The Firefight:

  1. Efforts by the OCFA to extinguish the fire the morning it ignited were unprecedented. It was likely the first time in human history that the largest firefighting helicopters in the world made water drops on a structure at night.
    1. Conducting air operations at night always comes with risk, but the OCFA command staff agreed that the historical value of the hangar and its rich ties to the City of Tustin, especially its veteran community, warranted such risk for the potential reward of partially saving the building.
  2. As this aerial attack with three helicopters was occurring, the OCFA had over 70 firefighters on 11 Engines, 5 Trucks, Heavy Search & Rescue, and multiple other additional pieces of equipment aiding in the firefight.
  3. Unfortunately, this unprecedented aerial attack and robust ground crew presence did little to nothing to impede the fire’s path on this 17-story all-wood building (one of the largest ever constructed in the world).
  4. Built during WWII, the hangar had none of the fire suppression and patron survivability measures of today; no fire sprinklers, no hose line plumbing, and no access to upper levels.
  5. In short, it became evident that no amount of firefighting resources, aircraft, or personnel was going to stop the fire from burning itself out – at least not without a direct risk to the lives of our firefighters.

The Plan:

  1. It was then determined by the Fire Chief and Incident Commander that the safest and most operationally sound method to extinguish this fire was to allow it to burn itself out over several days.
  2. At no point in the ensuing days has there been a safe or effective opportunity for firefighters to approach or engage the fire with ground resources, and even if there was, the AQMD’s perimeter eliminates any potential approach of firefighters.
  3. Further, because helicopter drops cannot access the void spaces in which the fire is burning itself out, an aerial attack is also not a viable or safe option.
  4. The expected upticks in fire activity present no threat of spread to surrounding structures and there is no debris in the smoke due to the low energy of the fire. 
  5. In other words, what the Fire Chief stated publicly at the incident’s first Press Conference — the safest and most operationally sound method of extinguishing this fire is to let it burn out — remains valid.

Show All Answers

1. WHAT DO I DO IF I COME ACROSS DEBRIS I THINK IS FROM THE HANGAR?
2. WHAT SHOULD I DO IF I SEE A PIECE OF DEBRIS?
3. WHAT CAUSED THE FIRE?
4. WHY DID OCFA LET THE FIRE BURN?
5. WHAT SHOULD I DO IF I THINK MYSELF OR MY FAMILY IS HAVING RESPIRATORY DIFFICULTY?
6. DO I NEED A MASK?
7. CAN I VISIT THE HANGAR?
8. IS KENSINGTON PARK SHOPPING CENTER STILL OPEN?
9. IS IT SAFE INSIDE?
10. IS IT SAFE TO BE OUTSIDE?
11. ARE PETS SAFE TO BE OUTDOORS?
12. IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DETECTION AND MITIGATION?
13. ARE THERE PLANS TO CONDUCT AIR MONITORING OUTSIDE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN?
14. CAN I CALL MY OWN CERTIFIED ASBESTOS COMPANY DETECTION COMPANY?
15. CAN I HOSE OFF DEBRIS ON MY PROPERTY?
16. CAN I DO OUTSIDE LAWNCARE?
17. IS THERE A CONCERN ABOUT ASBESTOS IN DRINKING WATER / GROUNDWATER BASIN?
18. WHAT ABOUT THE WATER RUNOFF?
19. AT WHAT LOCATIONS ARE THE WATER SAMPLES BEING TAKEN?
20. WITH RAINFALL, DOES THE COUNTY PERFORM WATER QUALITY TESTING?
21. WHEN WAS WATER SAMPLING PERFORMED?
22. WHAT DOES THE COUNTY'S STORMWATER SAMPLING TEST FOR? DOES IT INCLUDE TESTING FOR THE PRESENCE OF ASBESTOS?
23. IS THERE A CONCERN ABOUT ASBESTOS IN STORMWATER MOVING THROUGH STORM DRAINS AND FLOOD CONTROL CHANNELS?
24. WHEN ARE STORMWATER TEST RESULTS AVAILABLE AFTER TAKING THE WATER SAMPLE?