Doesn’t that oath mean the City must fight every State law that may be preempted by the Federal Constitution or Federal law?

No, the Tustin City Council has already unanimously declared its opposition to Senate Bill (SB) 54 in a public meeting and in writing, and supporting and defending the Constitution does not require the City to go further by spending Tustin’s limited taxpayer dollars on litigation whenever a State law may be inconsistent with a Federal law. Must cities expend limited public resources fighting the legalization of cannabis in California, for instance, simply because that law may be inconsistent with Federal law? No.

SB 54 is already being aggressively challenged in Federal Court in Fresno by the Federal Government and other well-funded organizations. As explained above, SB 54 does not affect how Tustin’s Police Department goes about protecting the public and enforcing the law in Tustin, and Tustin prefers to invest its law enforcement funds and resources here at home in support of that continuing commitment to public safety.

Show All Answers

1. Why doesn’t the Tustin City Council declare its opposition to SB 54?
2. Is the City’s letter opposing SB 54 being kept secret?
3. Is the City of Tustin a “sanctuary city”?
4. Has SB 54 had any practical impact on the ways in which the Tustin Police Department protects the residents and businesses in the City?
5. Doesn’t SB 54 affect who the Tustin Police Department notifies when it releases inmates from jail?
6. Does Tustin coordinate with Federal authorities (including immigration authorities) about gangs, murderers, rapists and other serious felons?
7. If Tustin doesn’t declare its opposition to SB 54, will law-breaking immigrants flock to Tustin?
8. Does the Tustin City Council support the United States Constitution?
9. Doesn’t that oath mean the City must fight every State law that may be preempted by the Federal Constitution or Federal law?